Swiss Back Channel Helped Defuse
U.S.-Iran Crisis
By Drew Hinshaw,
Joe Parkinson and Benoit Faucon (wsj)
Updated Jan. 11, 2020 5:04 am ET
The U.S. sent an
encrypted fax via the Swiss Embassy in Tehran urging Iran not to escalate,
followed by a flurry of back and forth messages
BERN, Switzerland—Hours after a U.S. strike killed Iranian
Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, the Trump administration
sent an urgent back channel message to Tehran: Don’t escalate.
The encrypted fax was sent via the Swiss Embassy in Iran,
one of the few means of direct, confidential communication between the two
sides, U.S. officials said.
In the days that followed, the White House and Iranian
leaders exchanged further messages, which officials in both countries described
as far more measured than the fiery rhetoric traded publicly by politicians.
A week later, and after a retaliatory Iranian missile attack
on two military bases hosting American troops that inflicted no casualties,
Washington and Tehran seemed to be stepping back from the brink of open
hostilities—for now.
“We don’t communicate with the Iranians that much, but when
we do the Swiss have played a critical role to convey messages and avoid
miscalculation,” a senior U.S. official said.
A spokesman at Iran’s mission to the United Nations declined
to comment on the exchanges but said “we appreciate [the Swiss] for any efforts
they make to provide an efficient channel to exchange letters when and if
necessary.”
One Iranian official said the back channel provided a
welcome bridge, when all others had been burned: “In the desert, even a drop of
water matters.”
From the Swiss Embassy, a Shah-era mansion overlooking
Tehran, the country’s role as a diplomatic intermediary has stretched through
four turbulent decades and seven presidencies, from the hostage crisis under
Jimmy Carter to Barack Obama’s nuclear deal. It has seldom been tested like
this.
The Americans’ first note was sent immediately after
Washington confirmed the death of Gen. Soleimani, the most important figure in
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the U.S. officials said.
It arrived on a special encrypted fax machine in a sealed
room of the Swiss mission—the most enduring method since the 1979 Islamic
Revolution—for the White House to exchange messages with Iran’s top leadership.
The equipment operates on a secure Swiss government network
linking its Tehran embassy to the Foreign Ministry in Bern and its embassy in
Washington, say Swiss diplomats. Only the most senior officials have the key
cards needed to use the equipment.
Swiss Ambassador Markus Leitner, a 53-year-old career
diplomat, delivered the American message by hand to Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif early on Friday morning, according to U.S. and
Swiss officials.
Mr. Leitner, reached by email, declined to comment. The
Swiss Foreign Ministry confirmed there had been an exchange of messages, but declined to comment further.
Mr. Zarif responded to the U.S. missive with anger,
according to an official familiar with the exchange. “[U.S. Secretary of State
Mike] Pompeo is a bully,” he said, according to one U.S. official briefed on
Mr. Zarif’s response. “The U.S. is the cause of all the problems.”
The Swiss ambassador regularly visits Washington for
closed-door sessions with Pentagon, State Department and intelligence officials
eager to tap his knowledge about Iran’s opaque and fluid politics.
Mr. Leitner spent the days after Gen. Soleimani’s killing
shuttling back and forth in a low-key but high-wire diplomatic mission designed
to let each side speak candidly. It was a contrast to the jabs of President
Trump and Mr. Zarif on Twitter.
On Jan. 4, the day after the killing, Mr. Trump tweeted that
he had picked out 52 targets, including Iranian heritage sites for potential
retaliation if America suffered losses. “Those targets, and Iran itself, WILL
BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD,” the tweet said.
Mr. Zarif replied the next day: “A reminder to those
hallucinating about emulating ISIS war crimes by targeting our cultural
heritage,” he wrote. “Through MILLENNIA of history, barbarians have come and
ravaged our cities, razed our monuments and burnt our libraries. Where are they
now? We’re still here, & standing tall.”
RELATED
·
Trump’s New National Security Team Made Fast
Work of Iran Strike
·
How the U.S.’s Messaging Has Changed on the
Soleimani Intelligence
·
Graphic: Power in Iran After Soleimani
·
U.S. Targeted but Missed Senior Iranian
Commander in Yemen, Officials Say
·
Trump Administration Expands Iran Sanctions
That same day, Mr. Zarif called the Swiss ambassador to take
a message to the U.S. It was more restrained, according to the U.S. officials.
Statements from both sides helped prevent miscalculations, the officials said.
“When tensions with Iran were high, the Swiss played a
useful and reliable role that both sides appreciated,” said a senior Trump
administration official. “Their system is like a light that never turns off.”
The Swiss have served as messengers between Washington and
Tehran since 1980, in the wake of the seizure of the American Embassy—and 52
hostages —in Tehran by Iranian revolutionaries. Swiss diplomats call the role
the “brieftrager” or “the postman.”
In the years after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003,
the Swiss shepherded messages to help avoid direct clashes. When President
Obama assumed office, Switzerland hosted the talks that led to a nuclear deal.
When Washington lifted sanctions, Swiss businesses had an early jump on rivals.
When Mr. Trump re-imposed sanctions, he gave the Swiss a
phone number to pass the Iranians, saying: “I’d like to see them call me.”
So far, Tehran has continued to speak through the Swiss.
Former Swiss ambassadors say the diplomatic channel is
effective because the U.S. and Iran can trust a message will remain
confidential, be delivered quickly, and will reach only its intended
recipients. Statements passed on the back channel are always precisely phrased,
diplomatic, and free of emotion, they said.
Landlocked Switzerland, a country of nine million with no
standing army, parlays its role as “postman” to lever access to the great
powers.
Currently, Swiss diplomats are working to get Washington’s
green light for Swiss banks to finance exports to Iran that aren’t subject to
sanctions—like food and medicine.
“We do things for the world community, and it’s good,” said
a former ambassador. “But it is also good for our interests.”
Iran isn’t the only geopolitical hot spot where the Swiss
Embassy represents U.S. or other countries’ interests after the breakdown of
diplomatic relations.
The Swiss now holds six mandates including representing Iran
in Saudi Arabia, Georgia in Russia and Turkey in Libya. In April 2019, the
Trump administration asked Bern to represent it in Venezuela
but President Nicolás Maduro’s government has yet to approve.
As tensions between Washington and Tehran have escalated,
the channel has remained active. In December the two countries released
prisoners at the same time at a special hangar in the Zurich airport.
U.S. special envoy on Iran Brian Hook and Iran’s Mr. Zarif
sat in separate rooms as the Swiss directed the carefully choreographed
exchange.
“The Swiss channel has become enormously important because
of what they can do in the short term to lessen tensions,” said former New
Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, who worked with the Swiss on the prisoner
exchange. “It’s the only viable channel right now.”
—Dion Nissenbaum contributed to
this article.
Write to Drew Hinshaw at drew.hinshaw@wsj.com, Joe Parkinson at joe.parkinson@wsj.com and Benoit Faucon at benoit.faucon@wsj.com