|
Dec/Arg |
Name of Case (October Term
2010) |
Disp |
L.Ct. |
Cn |
S/P/J |
Cr |
Ka |
So |
Gi |
Br |
Ke |
Al |
Ro |
Sc |
Th |
Total |
1 |
11-15/10-4 |
Abbott v US--18:924(c), mand. Minimum (2) |
A |
3,5 |
|
S |
X |
NP |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
8 to 0 |
2 |
11-30/10-5 |
L.A.County v Humphries--1983, atty fees |
RR |
9 |
|
S/P |
|
NP |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
8 to 0 |
3 |
1-11/11-8 |
Mayo Fdn v US--IRS, resident MDs' FICA |
A |
8 |
|
S |
|
NP |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
8 to 0 |
4 |
1-11/10-4 |
Ransom v FIA Card Serv--bkrptcy "means" |
A |
9 |
|
S |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
D |
x |
8 to 1 |
5 |
1-19/10-12 |
Harrington v Richter--hc 2254(d) ineff asst |
RR |
9 |
|
S |
X |
NP |
CJ |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
(7+1) to 0 |
6 |
1-19/10-12 |
Premo v Moore--hc 2254(d) ineff assistance |
RR |
9 |
|
S |
X |
NP |
CJ |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
(7+1) to 0 |
7 |
1-19/10-5 |
NASA v Nelson--rt to informational privacy |
RR |
9 |
X |
|
|
NP |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
CJ |
CJ |
(6+2) to 0 |
8 |
1-24/12-7 |
Thompson v NAS--Title VII, fiance retaliation SJ |
RR |
6 |
|
S |
|
NP |
x |
C |
C |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
8 to 0 |
9 |
1-24/11-1 |
Ortiz v Jordan--1983, prisoner abuse SJ proc. |
RR |
6 |
|
P |
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
CJ |
x |
x |
CJ |
CJ |
(6+3) to 0 |
10 |
1-24/12-8 |
Chase Bank v McCoy--Reg Z, class action D |
RR |
9 |
|
S |
|
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
11 |
2-22/10-12 |
Bruesewitz v Wyeth--no fault vaccine law SJ |
A |
3 |
|
S |
|
NP |
D |
D |
CJ |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
(5+1) to 2 |
12 |
2-22/11-10 |
CSX v Ala Dept of Rev--discriminatory tax D |
RR |
11 |
|
S |
|
X |
x |
D |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
D |
7 to 2 |
13 |
2-23/11-29 |
Walker v Martin--st ct h.c. procedures |
R |
9 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
14 |
2-23/11-3 |
Williamson v Mazda--preemption seat blt tort D |
R |
CaAp |
|
S |
|
NP |
C |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
CJ |
(7+1) to 0 |
15 |
2-28/10-5 |
Mich. V Bryant--6thA testimonial statements |
VR |
SCtMi |
X |
|
X |
NP |
X |
D |
x |
x |
x |
x |
D |
CJ |
(5+1) to 2 |
16 |
3-1/1-19 |
FCC v AT&T--FOIA Exemption 7C Admin review |
R |
3 |
|
S |
|
NP |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
8 to 0 |
17 |
3-1/11-2 |
Staub v Proctor--USERRA liability |
RR |
7 |
|
|
|
NP |
x |
x |
x |
x |
CJ |
x |
X |
CJ |
(6+2) to 0 |
18 |
3-1/12-6 |
Henderson v Shinseki--S/L not "jurisdictional" |
RR |
FC |
|
S/J |
|
NP |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
8 to 0 |
19 |
3-2/10-6 |
Snyder v Phelps--1stA, Westboro Baptists |
A |
4 |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
C |
x |
D |
x |
x |
x |
8 to 1 |
20 |
3-2/12-6 |
Pepper v U.S.--sentencing
IFP |
VAR |
8 |
|
P |
X |
NP |
X |
x |
CCJ |
x |
CCJD |
x |
x |
D |
(5+1) to 2 |
21 |
3-7/10-13 |
Skinner v Switzer--DNA testing, 42:1983 D IFP |
RR |
5 |
|
|
X |
x |
x |
X |
x |
D |
D |
x |
x |
D |
6 to 3 |
22 |
3-7/11-29 |
Wall v Kholi--tolling S/L under AEDPA fed. h.c. |
A |
1 |
|
S |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
C |
x |
9 to 0 |
23 |
3-7/12-1 |
Milner v Dof Navy--FOIA Exemption 2, munitions |
RR |
9 |
|
S |
|
X |
x |
x |
D |
x |
C |
x |
x |
x |
8 to 1 |
24 |
3-22/10-13 |
Kasten v Saint-Gobain--FLSA retaliation SJ |
VR |
7 |
|
S |
|
NP |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
D |
D |
6 to 2 |
25 |
3-22/1-10 |
Matrixx v Siracusano--Rule 10b & 10b-5 D |
A |
9 |
|
S |
|
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
26 |
3-29/10-6 |
Connick, D.A. v Thompson--1983, Brady, stds |
R |
5 |
|
S |
X |
D |
D |
D |
D |
x |
C |
x |
C |
X |
5 to 4 |
27 |
3-29/1-19 |
Astra v Santa Clara County--Medicaid rebates |
R |
9 |
|
S |
|
NP |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
8 to 0 |
28 |
4-4/11-3 |
Az Christ School v Winn--taxpayer standing (2) |
R |
9 |
X |
P |
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
X |
x |
x |
C |
C |
5 to 4 |
29 |
4-4/11-9 |
Cullen v Pinholster--AEDPA, hc |
R |
9 |
|
S/P |
X |
D |
D |
D |
C,D |
x |
CCJ |
x |
x |
X |
(4+1) to 4 |
30 |
4-19/12-1 |
VaOPA v Stewart--Ex parte Young sov immun |
RR |
4 |
|
S |
|
NP |
x |
x |
x |
C |
D |
D |
X |
C |
6 to 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec/Arg |
Name of Case (October Term 2010) |
Disp |
L.Ct. |
Cn |
S/P/J |
Cr |
Ka |
So |
Gi |
Br |
Ke |
Al |
Ro |
Sc |
Th |
Total |
31 |
4-20/11-2 |
Sossamon v Tex--City of Boerne, RLUIPA, sov |
A |
5 |
X |
|
|
NP |
D |
x |
D |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
6 to 2 |
32 |
4-26/11/1 |
US v Tohono O'Odham--28:1500, concur juris |
RR |
FC |
|
J |
|
NP |
CJ |
D |
CJ |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
(5+2) to 1 |
33 |
4-27/11-9 |
AT&T v Concepcions--preemption |
RR |
9 |
X |
|
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
x |
x |
x |
X |
C |
5 to 4 |
34 |
5-2/1-10 |
Montana v Wyoming--water rights Exception |
O |
Orig |
|
|
|
NP |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
D |
X |
7 to 1 |
35 |
5-16/3-1 |
Schindler Elev v Kirk--"report" qui tam D |
RR |
2 |
|
J |
|
NP |
D |
D |
D |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
5 to 3 |
36 |
5-16/11-30 |
Cigna Corp v Amara--ERISA |
VR |
2 |
|
J |
|
x |
NP |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
CJ |
CJ |
(6+2) to 0 |
37 |
5-16/1-12 |
Kentucky v King--4thA exigent circumstances |
RR |
SCtKy |
X |
|
X |
x |
x |
D |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
8 to 1 |
38 |
5-23/1-18 |
Gen Dynamics v US--default, state secrets |
VR |
FC |
|
P/J |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
9 to 0 |
39 |
5-23/11-30 |
Brown v Plata--3 jdge ct, PRLA, prison condition |
A |
DCs |
X |
J |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
40 |
5-23/12-8 |
Cham Commerce v Whiting--aliens, preemption |
A |
9 |
|
S |
|
NP |
D |
D |
D |
x |
x |
X |
x |
CJ |
(4+1) to 4 |
41 |
5-26/2-22 |
US v Tinklenberg--Speedy Trial Act 18:3161 |
A |
6 |
|
S |
X |
NP |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
CCJ |
CCJ |
CCJ |
(5+3) to 0 |
42 |
5-26/3-29 |
Fowler v US--18:1512, witness tampering IFP |
VR |
11 |
|
S |
X |
x |
x |
D |
X |
x |
D |
x |
CJ |
x |
(6+1) to 2 |
43 |
5-26/3-1 |
Camreta v Greene--auth of ct to rev, mootness 2 |
VR |
9 |
|
P/J |
|
X |
CJ |
x |
CJ |
D |
x |
x |
x |
C |
(6+2) to 1 |
44 |
5-31/3-2 |
Ashcroft v al-Kidd--4thA, 18:3144, qual imm |
RR |
9 |
X |
|
X |
NP |
CJ |
CJ |
CJ |
C |
x |
x |
X |
x |
(5+3) to 0 |
45 |
5-31/2-23 |
Global Tech v SEB--patents, willful blindness |
A |
FC |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
D |
X |
x |
x |
x |
8 to 1 |
46 |
6-6/2-28 |
Junior Univ v Roche--patents, Bayh-Dole Act |
A |
FC |
|
S |
|
x |
C |
D |
D |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
7 to 2 |
47 |
6-6/4-25 |
EPJ Fund v Halliburton--Rule 10(b) suit, class a |
VR |
5 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
48 |
6-6/4-25 |
McNeill v US--18:922 "serious drug offense" IFP |
A |
4 |
|
S |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
9 to 0 |
49 |
6-6/3-22 |
Fox v Vice--42:1988 atty fees |
VR |
5 |
|
S |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
50 |
6-9/1-12 |
Sykes v US--18:924 (ACCA), Plea IFP |
A |
7 |
|
S |
X |
D |
x |
D |
x |
X |
x |
x |
D |
CJ |
(5+1) to 3 |
51 |
6-9/3-30 |
Talk America v Mich Bell--47:251(c)(3) |
R |
6 |
|
S |
|
NP |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
C |
X |
8 to 0 |
52 |
6-9/2-28 |
DePierre v US--21:841 "cocaine base" |
A |
1 |
|
S |
X |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
CCJ |
x |
(8+1) to 0 |
53 |
6-9/4-18 |
Microsoft v I4I LP--patent infringement |
A |
FC |
|
S |
|
x |
X |
x |
C |
x |
C |
NP |
C |
CJ |
(7+1) to 1 |
54 |
6-13/4-27 |
Nev Comm Ethics v Carrigan--recusal stat. 1stA |
RR |
NvSCt |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
C |
CCJ |
x |
X |
x |
(8+1) to 0 |
55 |
6-13/12-7 |
Janus Cap v 1st Derivative--10b-5
D |
R |
4 |
|
S |
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
5 to 4 |
56 |
6-13/4-20 |
US v Jicarilla Apache--a-c priv, fid excp Motion |
RR |
FC |
|
P |
|
NP |
D |
CJ |
CJ |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
(5+2) to 1 |
57 |
6-16/2-22 |
Bond v US--standing, 10th A, 18:229 treaty D |
RR |
3 |
|
P |
|
x |
x |
CJ |
C |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
58 |
6-16/3-21 |
Davis v US--4th exclusionary rule
IFP |
A |
11 |
X |
|
X |
x |
CJ |
D |
D |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
(6+1) to 2 |
59 |
6-16/3-23 |
JDB v North Carolina--Miranda juvenile IFP |
RR |
NCSCt |
X |
|
X |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
60 |
6-16/1-18 |
Smith v Bayer Corp--injunctions state ct |
R |
8 |
|
P/J |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
[CJ] |
(8+1) to 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec/Arg |
Name of Case (October Term 2010) |
Disp |
L.Ct. |
Cn |
S/P/J |
Cr |
Ka |
So |
Gi |
Br |
Ke |
Al |
Ro |
Sc |
Th |
Total |
61 |
6-16/4-18 |
Tapia v US--sentencing, rehabilitation IFP |
RR |
9 |
|
S |
X |
X |
C |
x |
x |
x |
C |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
62 |
6-20/3-29 |
Wal-Mart v Dukes--Rule 23 class cert |
RR |
9 |
|
P |
|
C,D |
C,D |
C,D |
C,D |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
5 to 4 |
63 |
6-20/3-22 |
Duryea v Guarnieri--1st A Petition
Cl=lawsuit? |
VR |
3 |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
CJ,D |
CJ |
(7+1) to 1 |
64 |
6-20/4-19 |
AmElecPow v Conn--pol quest, stand fed C/L D |
RR |
2 |
|
J |
|
x |
NP |
X |
x |
x |
CCJ |
x |
x |
CCJ |
(6+2) to 0 |
65 |
6-20/3-23 |
Turner v Rogers--mootness, 6th &14thA coun |
VR |
SCSCt |
X |
J |
X |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
66 |
6-23/1-18 |
Stern v Marshall--Art III, bankruptcy ct juris |
A |
9 |
X |
|
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
x |
x |
X |
C |
x |
5 to 4 |
67 |
6-23/2-23 |
Freeman v US--sent. Guidelines, pleas IFP |
RR |
6 |
|
S |
X |
x |
CJ |
x |
x |
X |
D |
D |
D |
D |
(4+1) to 4 |
68 |
6-23/4-26 |
Sorrell, VtA-G v IMS Health--1stA |
A |
2 |
X |
|
|
D |
x |
D |
D |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
6 to 3 |
69 |
6-23/3-30 |
Pliva v Mensing--pre-emption
3 |
RR |
8,5 |
|
S |
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
[CJ] |
x |
x |
x |
X |
(4+1) to 4 |
70 |
6-23/3-2 |
Bullcoming v NM--6thA Confront lab rept IFP |
RR |
NMSCt |
X |
|
X |
[CJ] |
C |
X |
D |
D |
D |
D |
x |
[CJ] |
(2+3) to 4 |
71 |
6-23/3-28 |
CSX v McBride--FELA, prox cause element |
A |
7 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
D |
D |
D |
D |
[CJ] |
(4+!) to 4 |
72 |
6-27/3-28 |
AZ PAC v Bennett--1stA state campaign finance
2 |
R |
9 |
X |
|
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
5 to 4 |
73 |
6-27/11-2 |
Brown v EMA--1stA violent video games |
A |
9 |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
D |
x |
CJ |
CJ |
X |
D |
(5+2) to 2 |
74 |
6-27/1-11 |
McIntyre Mach v Nicastro--pers juris contacts DP |
R |
NJSCt |
X |
J |
|
D |
D |
D |
CJ |
X |
CJ |
x |
x |
x |
(4+2) to 3 |
75 |
6-27/1-11 |
GoodyearDunlop v Brown--pers juris |
R |
NCCA |
X |
J |
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|