|
Dec/Arg |
Name of Case (October Term
2013) |
Disp |
L.Ct. |
Cn |
S/P/J |
Cr |
Ka |
So |
Gi |
Br |
Ke |
Al |
Ro |
Sc |
Th |
Total |
1 |
11-5/10-8 |
Burt v Titlow--AEDPA std of fed review h.c. |
R |
6 |
|
S |
X |
x |
C |
CJ |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
(8+1) to 0 |
2 |
12-3/10-9 |
US v Woods--tax avoidance, TEFRA, jurisdiction |
R |
5 |
|
S/J |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
9 to 0 |
3 |
12-3/10-9 |
Atlantic Marine v USDC--mandamus, forum selec |
RR |
5 |
|
P |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
4 |
12-10/11-5 |
Sprint v Jacobs--Younger abstention doctrine Dis |
R |
8 |
|
J |
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
5 |
12-11/10-16 |
Kansas v Cheever--5th, Estelle, Buchanan mental |
VR |
SCtKS |
X |
|
X |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
6 |
12-16/10-15 |
Heimeshoff v Hartford--ERISA limitations cl Dis |
A |
2 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
9 to 0 |
7 |
1-14/10-15 |
DaimlerAG v Bauman--DP, Alien Tort, per jur Dis |
R |
9 |
X |
J |
|
x |
CJ |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
(8+1) to 0 |
8 |
1-14/11-6 |
Miss. V AU Optronics--"mass action" 28:§1332(d) |
RR |
5 |
|
J |
|
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
9 |
1-15/12-9 |
Haluch v [Unions]--untimely appeal FRAP |
RR |
1 |
|
P |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
10 |
1-22/11-5 |
Medtronic v Mirowski--patent infringement bop |
RR |
FC |
|
P/J |
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
11 |
1-27/11-12 |
Burrage v US--18:841, "but-for" causality IFP |
RR |
8 |
|
S |
|
x |
CJ |
CJ |
x |
x |
CJ |
x |
X |
x |
(6+3) to 0 |
12 |
1-27/11-4 |
Sandifer v US Steel--"donning and doffing" SJ |
A |
7 |
|
S |
|
x |
CJ |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
(8+1) to 0 |
13 |
1-27/12-9 |
Air Wisconsin v Hoeper--ATSA, defamation, priv |
RR |
SCtCO |
|
S |
|
A,D |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
A,D |
A,D |
6 to 3 |
14 |
2-25/11-4 |
Walden v Fiore--personal jurisdiction |
R |
9 |
|
J |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
9 to 0 |
15 |
2-25/11-13 |
Fernandez v Cal--4thA, Randolphsuppression IFP |
A |
CACal |
X |
|
X |
D |
D |
D |
x |
x |
X |
x |
C |
C |
6 to 3 |
16 |
2-25/10-16 |
Kaley v. US--§853 pre-trial forfeiture DP, 6thA |
AR |
11 |
X |
|
X |
X |
D |
x |
D |
x |
x |
D |
x |
x |
6 to 3 |
17 |
2-26/12-4 |
US v Apel--18:1382, military base trespass |
VR |
9 |
|
S |
X |
x |
C |
C |
x |
x |
C |
X |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
18 |
2-26/10-7 |
Chadbourne v Troice--15:78bb securities Dis 3 |
A |
5 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
D |
x |
x |
C |
7 to 2 |
19 |
3-4/1-13 |
Law v Siegel--bankruptcy law IFP |
RR |
9 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
9 to 0 |
20 |
3-4/11-12 |
Lawson v FMR--Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblow Dis |
RR |
1 |
|
S |
|
x |
D |
X |
x |
D |
D |
x |
CPPCJ |
CPPCJ |
(4+2) to 3 |
21 |
3-5/12-11 |
Lozano v Montoya--Child abduction treaty tolling |
A |
2 |
|
T |
|
x |
C |
x |
C |
x |
C |
x |
x |
X |
9 to 0 |
22 |
3-5/12-2 |
BG Group v Argentina--UK-AR
treaty |
R |
DC |
|
T |
|
x |
CJ |
x |
X |
D |
x |
D |
x |
x |
6 to 3 |
23 |
3-5/11-12 |
Rosemund v US--18:2, aiding and abetting |
VR |
10 |
|
S |
X |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
C,D |
x |
CJ* |
C,D |
7* to 2 |
24 |
3-10/1-14 |
BrandtTrust v US--Rails to Trails, easements SJ |
RR |
10 |
|
S |
|
x |
D |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
8 to 1 |
25 |
3-25/12-3 |
Lexmark v Static--Lanham Act standing Dis |
A |
6 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
9 to 0 |
26 |
3-25/1-14 |
US v Quality Stores--Bankrptcy FICA tax SJ |
RR |
6 |
|
S |
|
NP |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
8 to 0 |
27 |
3-26/1-15 |
US v Castleman--18:922g9 "violence" Dis |
RR |
6 |
|
S |
|
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
CJ |
x |
CCJ |
CJ |
(6+3) to 0 |
28 |
4-2/10-8 |
McCutcheon v FEC--1stA BCRA contributions Dis |
RR |
DCDC |
X |
|
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
x |
X |
x |
x |
CJ |
(4+1) to 4 |
29 |
4-2/12-3 |
Northwest v Ginsberg--ADA preemption |
RR |
9 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
30 |
4-22/10-15 |
Schuette v BAMN--14thEP, colleg aff action
SJ |
R |
6 |
X |
|
|
NP |
D |
D |
CJ |
X |
x |
x |
CJ |
CJ |
(3+3) to 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec/Arg |
Name of Case (October Term 2011) |
Disp |
L.Ct. |
Cn |
S/P/J |
Cr |
Ka |
So |
Gi |
Br |
Ke |
Al |
Ro |
Sc |
Th |
Total |
31 |
4-22/1-21 |
Prado v CA--4thA traffic stop, suppression IFP |
A |
CACal |
X |
|
X |
D |
D |
D |
x |
x |
x |
x |
D |
X |
5 to 4 |
32 |
4-23/12-11 |
White v Woodall--5thA no inference instr
hc |
RR |
6 |
X |
|
X |
x |
D |
D |
D |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
6 to 3 |
33 |
4-23/1-22 |
Paroline v US--18:2259 prox cause writ mand IFP |
VR |
5 |
|
S |
X |
x |
D |
x |
x |
X |
x |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
34 |
4-29/12-10 |
EPA v Homer City--stat. auth.agency 2 |
RR |
DC |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
NP |
x |
D |
D |
6 to 2 |
35 |
4-29/2-26 |
Octane v Icon--35:393 inherent
jud power SJ |
RR |
FC |
|
S |
|
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
CJ |
x |
(8+1) to 0 |
36 |
4-29/2-26 |
Highmark v Allcare--35:285 fee shifting Octane |
VR |
FC |
|
S |
|
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
37 |
5-5/11-6 |
Town of Greece v Galloway--1stA
Establish SJ |
R |
2 |
X |
|
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
X |
C |
x |
CCJ |
CCJ |
(3+2) to 4 |
38 |
5-5/2-25 |
Robers v US--18:3663 crim restitution IFP |
A |
7 |
|
S |
|
x |
C |
C |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
39 |
5-19/1-21 |
Petrella v MGM--Raging Bull, copyright, laches D |
RR |
9 |
|
S/P |
|
x |
x |
X |
D |
D |
x |
D |
x |
x |
6 to 3 |
40 |
5-27/3-3 |
Hall v Florida--8th, 14th cap punish IQ71 IFP |
RR |
SCtFla |
X |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
41 |
5-27/3-26 |
Wood v Moss--1stA Bivens viewpoint discrim Dis |
R |
9 |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
42 |
5-27/3-4 |
Plumhoff v Rickard--4thA 1983 SJ |
RR |
6 |
X |
X |
|
x |
x |
CJ |
CJ |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
(7+2) to 0 |
43 |
5-27/12-2 |
Michigan v Bay Mills--tribal sov immunity |
AR |
6 |
|
|
|
X |
C |
D |
x |
x |
D |
x |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
44 |
6-2/11-5 |
Bond v US--18:229 chem weapons simple assault |
RR |
3 |
|
X |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
CJ |
X |
CJ |
CJ |
(6+3) to 0 |
45 |
6-2/4-28 |
Nautilus v Biosig--35:112 Patent Act SJ |
VR |
FC |
|
X |
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
46 |
6-2/4-30 |
Limelight v Akamai--35: 271 patent infringement |
RR |
FC |
|
X |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
47 |
6-9/4-23 |
CTS Corp v Waldburger--42:9658 S/L preempt Dis |
R |
4 |
|
X |
|
x |
x |
D |
D |
X |
CCJ |
CCJ |
CCJ |
CCJ |
(3+4) to 2 |
48 |
6-9/1-14 |
Exec Benefits v Arkison--Art III Stern clms S/P |
A |
3 |
X |
J |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
49 |
6-9/12-10 |
Scialabba v Cuellar--8:1153A INA SJ |
RR |
9 |
|
S |
|
X |
D |
x |
D |
x |
D |
CJ |
CJ |
D |
(3+2) to 4 |
50 |
6-12/4-21 |
POM Wonderful v Coca-Cola--statute conflict SJ |
RR |
9 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
NP |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
8 to 0 |
51 |
6-12/3-24 |
Clark et ux v Rameker--Chapter 7, inhereted IRAs |
A |
7 |
|
S |
|
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
52 |
6-16/4-21 |
Argentina v NML--FSIA, post-jment discovery |
A |
2 |
|
S |
|
x |
NP |
D |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
7 to 1 |
53 |
6-16/4-22 |
Susan B Anthony v Driehaus--Art
III standing Dis |
RR |
6 |
X |
J |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
9 to 0 |
54 |
6-16/1-22 |
Abramski v US--Gun purchases |
A |
4 |
|
S |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5to 4 |
55 |
6-23/3-5 |
Halliburton v Erica John--class action certification |
VR |
5 |
|
P |
|
x |
C |
C |
C |
x |
X |
CJ |
CJ |
CJ |
(6+3) to 0 |
56 |
6-23/2-24 |
Utility Air Reg v EPA--air pollution regs Dis 6 |
AR |
DC |
|
S |
|
CD |
CD |
CD |
CD |
x |
x |
CD |
X |
CD |
(3+4+2) |
57 |
6-23/4-1 |
Loughrin v US--18:1344 bank fraud intent |
A |
10 |
|
S |
X |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
CCJ |
CCJ |
x |
(7+2) to 0 |
58 |
5-25/4-22 |
ABC v Aereo--17:106(4) Transmit Clause |
RR |
2 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
D |
D |
D |
6 to 3 |
59 |
6-25/4-2 |
Fifth Third v Dudenhoeffer--ESOP ERISA Dis |
VR |
6 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
60 |
6-25/4-29 |
Riley v CA--4th A, search cell phones wo warrant 2 |
RR,A |
CalCA |
X |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
CCJ |
x |
x |
(8+1) to 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec/Arg |
Name of Case (October Term 2011) |
Disp |
L.Ct. |
Cn |
S/P/J |
Cr |
Ka |
So |
Gi |
Br |
Ke |
Al |
Ro |
Sc |
Th |
Total |
61 |
6-26/1-13 |
NLRB v Canning--Recess
Appointments Cl |
A |
DC |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
CJ |
CJ |
CJ |
CJ |
(5+4) to 0 |
62 |
6-30/3-25 |
Burwell v Hobby Lobby--RFRA v ACA 2 |
A, RR |
10 |
|
S |
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
C |
X |
x |
x |
x |
5 to 4 |
63 |
6-30/1-21 |
Harris v Quinn--1stA, Medicaid, union dues |
R |
7 |
X |
|
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
5 to 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|