|
Dec/Arg |
Name of Case (October Term
2014) |
Disp |
L.Ct. |
Cn |
S/P/J |
Cr |
Ka |
So |
Gi |
Br |
Ke |
Ro |
Al |
Sc |
Th |
Total |
1 |
12-9/10-8 |
Integrity Staffing v Busk--FSLA screenings D |
R |
9 |
|
S |
|
C |
C |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
9 to 0 |
2 |
12-9/10-8 |
Warger v Shauers--FRE 606(b) juror |
A |
8 |
|
P |
|
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
3 |
12-15/10-6 |
Heien v North Carolina--4thA, traffic stop |
A |
NCSCt |
X |
|
X |
C |
D |
C |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
8 to 1 |
4 |
12-15/10-7 |
Dart Cherokee v Owens--28:1446 removal |
VR |
10 |
|
P |
|
D |
x |
X |
x |
D |
x |
x |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
5 |
12-15/NO |
US v California--submerged land boundaries |
SupDec |
Orig |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 to 0 |
6 |
1-13/11-4 |
Jesinoski v Countrywide--15:1635 resciss. SJ |
RR |
8 |
|
S/P |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
9 to 0 |
7 |
1-13/12-2 |
Whitfield v US--18:2113, forced accomp IFP |
A |
4 |
|
S |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
9 to 0 |
8 |
1-14/10-15 |
Jennings v Stephens--h.c. appeals IFP |
RR |
5 |
|
S/P |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
D |
x |
D |
X |
D |
6 to 3 |
9 |
1-14/11-10 |
T-Mobile v Roswell--47:332, notice |
RR |
11 |
|
S/P |
|
x |
X |
D |
x |
x |
D |
C |
x |
D |
6 to 3 |
10 |
1-20/10-15 |
Teva Pharm v Sandoz--35:112, std of rev |
VR |
FC |
|
P |
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
D |
x |
D |
7 to 2 |
11 |
1-20/10-7 |
Holt v Hobbs--RLUIPA, prison beards IFP |
RR |
8 |
|
S |
|
x |
C |
C |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
12 |
1-21/11-4 |
DHS v MacLean--TSA, whistleblower |
A |
FC |
|
S |
|
x |
D |
x |
x |
D |
X |
x |
x |
x |
7 to 2 |
13 |
1-21/12-9 |
Gelboim v BCA--FRCP 54(b), 28: 1291, 1407 D |
RR |
2 |
|
P |
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
14 |
1-21/12-3 |
Hana Fin v Hana Bank--trademrk tacking doct |
A |
9 |
|
S/P |
|
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
15 |
1-26/11-10 |
M&G v Tackett--ERISA, CBA |
VR |
6 |
|
P |
|
C |
C |
C |
C |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
9 to 0 |
16 |
2-24/10-14 |
Kansas v Nebraska--RepRiverComp disgorge |
ExOv |
Orig |
|
|
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
C,D |
C,D |
C,D |
C,D |
5 to 4 |
17 |
2-25/10-14 |
NC Dental v FTC--state-action anti-trust imm |
A |
4 |
|
P |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
x |
D |
D |
6 to 3 |
18 |
2-25/11-5 |
Yates v US--18:1519 crim stat interpretation |
RR |
11 |
|
S |
X |
D |
x |
X |
x |
D |
CJ |
x |
D |
D |
(4+1) to 4 |
19 |
3-3/12-8 |
Direct Marketing v Brohl--28:1341 TIA SJ |
RR |
10 |
|
S/J |
|
x |
C |
C |
C |
C |
x |
x |
x |
X |
9 to 0 |
20 |
3-4/12-9 |
AlaDeptRev v CSX--tax discrimination RRRRA |
RR |
11 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
D |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
7 to 2 |
21 |
3-9/12-8 |
Dot v AARr--5thDP S/P Amtrak as gov entity |
VR |
DC |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
C |
x |
CJ |
(8+1) to 0 |
22 |
3-9/12-1 |
Perez v Mort Bankrs--APA ParalyzedVetsSJ 2 |
R |
DC |
|
S/P |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
CCJ |
CJ |
CJ |
(6+3) to 0 |
23 |
3-9/NO |
Kansas v Nebraska--RepRiverComp disgorge |
Decree |
Orig |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
3-24/12-2 |
B&B v Hargis--trademrk issue preclusion |
RR |
8 |
|
P/J |
|
x |
x |
C |
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
D |
7 to 2 |
25 |
3-24/11-3 |
Omnicare v LDCCIPF--SEC 15:77 D |
VR |
6 |
|
S |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
CJ,C |
CJ |
(7+2) to 0 |
26 |
3-25/12-3 |
Young v UPS--Tit. 7 "issue of material fact" SJ |
VR |
4 |
|
P |
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
x |
CJ |
D |
D |
(5+1) to 3 |
27 |
3-25/11-12 |
Ala Black Caucus v Ala--VRA state legis 2 |
VR |
AlDC |
|
P |
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
28 |
3-31/1-20 |
Armstrong v Except Child--Medicaid SupCl SJ |
R |
9 |
X |
S |
|
D |
D |
D |
CJ,C |
D |
x |
x |
X |
x |
(4+1) to 4 |
29 |
4-21/1-21 |
Rodrigues v US--4thA traff dogsniff Suppr IFP |
VR |
8 |
X |
|
X |
x |
x |
X |
x |
D |
x |
D |
x |
D |
6 to 3 |
30 |
4-21/1-12 |
Oneok v Learjet--no preemption SJ |
A |
9 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
D |
x |
D |
CJ,C |
(6+1) to 2 |
|
Dec/Arg |
Name of Case (October Term 2014) |
Disp |
L.Ct. |
Cn |
S/P/J |
Cr |
Ka |
So |
Gi |
Br |
Ke |
Ro |
Al |
Sc |
Th |
Total |
31 |
4-22/12-10 |
US v Wong--FTCA S/L 28:2401 tolling Dis 2 |
AR |
9 |
|
S/P |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
32 |
4-29/1-20 |
Williams-Yulee v FL Bar--1stA jud campaign $ |
A |
FLSCt |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
CJ,C |
C |
D |
X |
D |
D |
D |
(4+1) to 4 |
33 |
4-29/1-13 |
Mach Mining v EEOC--Title VII, jud.review |
VR |
7 |
|
S/P |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
34 |
5-4/4-1 |
Bullard v BlueHills--Bnkrptcy, appllble order |
A |
1 |
|
S/P/J |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
35 |
5-18/4-1 |
Harris v Viegelahn,Trustee--Ch7 v Ch 13 Bnkr |
RR |
5 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
36 |
5-18/2-24 |
Tibble v Edison Int--ERISA S/L D |
VR |
9 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
37 |
5-18/2-23 |
Coleman v Tollefson--28:1915 prisoner IFP 3 |
A |
6 |
|
P |
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
38 |
5-18/11-12 |
Comptroller v Wynne--Md income tax CCl |
A |
MdCA |
X |
|
|
D |
x |
D |
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
39 |
5-18/3-23 |
San Fran v Sheehan--ADA apply to arrests SJ |
D*RR |
9 |
|
S |
|
C,D |
x |
x |
NP |
x |
x |
X |
C,D |
x |
(6+2) to 0 |
40 |
5-18/2-24 |
Henderson v US--felon firearms transfer D |
VR |
11 |
|
S |
X |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
41 |
5-26/3-31 |
Commil v Cisco Sys--induced patent infringe |
VR |
FC |
|
S/P |
|
x |
x |
x |
NP |
X |
D |
x |
D |
CJ* |
(5+1) to 2 |
42 |
5-26/1-13 |
Kellogg Brown v US--qui tam & WSLA S/L D |
RRA |
4 |
|
S/P |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
9 to 0 |
43 |
5-26/1-14 |
Wellness Int v Sharif--ch.7 bnkrptcy Art III D |
RR |
7 |
X |
|
|
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
D |
CCJ |
D |
D |
(5+1) to 3 |
44 |
6-1/12/1 |
Elonis v US--Int-net threats mens rea18:875c |
RR |
3 |
|
S |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
C,D |
x |
D |
7 to 2 |
45 |
6-1/2-25 |
EEOC v Abrcrmbie&Fitch--Muslimheadscarf |
RR |
10 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
CJ |
X |
C,D |
(7+1) to 1 |
46 |
6-1/3-24 |
Bank of America v Caulkett--ch.7 bnk 2 |
RR |
11 |
|
S |
|
x |
CJ |
x |
CJ |
CJ |
x |
x |
x |
X |
(6+3) to 0 |
47 |
6-1/1-14 |
Mellouli v Lynch--INS deportation |
R |
8 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
D |
x |
D |
7 to 2 |
48 |
6-8/11-3 |
Zivotofsky v Kerry--S/P, Art II,
§3 |
A |
DC |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
CJ |
X |
D |
D |
D |
CJ,D |
(4+1) to 4 |
49 |
6-15/2-23 |
Kerry v Din--visa denial D |
VR |
9 |
|
S |
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
CJ |
x |
CJ |
X |
x |
(3+2) to 4 |
50 |
6-15/2-25 |
BakerBotts v ASARCO--ch.11 bnkrptcy attfee |
A |
5 |
|
S |
|
D |
CCJ |
D |
D |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
(5+1) to 3 |
51 |
6-15/4-29 |
ReyesMata v Lynch--alien removal S/L |
RR |
5 |
|
S/P |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
D |
8 to 1 |
52 |
6-18/1-12 |
Reed v TownofGilbert--1stA church signs DPI |
RR |
9 |
X |
|
|
CJ |
C |
CJ |
CJ |
C |
x |
C |
x |
X |
(6+3) to 0 |
53 |
6-18/4-21 |
McFadden v US--scienter Analogue Act21:802 |
VR |
4 |
|
S |
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
CCJ |
x |
x |
X |
(8+1) to 0 |
54 |
6-18/3-23 |
Walker v Confederate Vets--1stA lic. Plates |
R |
5 |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
D |
D |
D |
x |
5 to 4 |
55 |
6-18/3-2 |
Ohio v Clark--6thA confrontation child Crawf |
RR |
SCtOH |
X |
|
X |
x |
x |
CJ |
x |
x |
x |
X |
CJ |
CJ |
(6+3) to 0 |
56 |
6-18/3-3 |
Davis v Ayala--14thEP, Batson, voirdire h.c. |
RR |
9 |
X* |
S |
X |
D |
D |
D |
D |
C |
x |
X |
x |
C |
5 to 4 |
57 |
6-18/3-30 |
Brumfield v Cain--cap pun mental Atkins h.c |
VR |
5 |
X* |
S |
X |
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
58 |
6-22/4-22 |
Horne v DoA--5thA Taking raisin mkting order |
R |
9 |
X |
|
|
C,D |
D |
C,D |
C,D |
x |
X |
x |
x |
C |
5 to 4 |
59 |
6-22/4-27 |
Kingsley v Hendrickson--14thDP 28:1983 cops |
VR |
7 |
X |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
X |
x |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
60 |
6-22/3-3 |
LA v Patel--4thA facial challengeguestrecords |
A |
9 |
X |
S |
|
x |
X |
x |
x |
x |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
|
Dec/Arg |
Name of Case (October Term 2014) |
Disp |
L.Ct. |
Cn |
S/P/J |
Cr |
Ka |
So |
Gi |
Br |
Ke |
Ro |
Al |
Sc |
Th |
Total |
61 |
6-22/3-31 |
Kimble v Marvel--pat. stare
decisis Brulotte |
A |
9 |
|
S |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
D |
D |
x |
D |
6 to 3 |
62 |
6-25/3-4 |
King v Burwell--Obamacare taxcredits D |
A |
4 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
D |
D |
6 to 3 |
63 |
6-25/1-21 |
Texas v ICP--FHA disparate impact |
AR |
5 |
|
S |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
64 |
6-26/4-20* |
Johnson v US--5thA DP 18:922, 924 ACCA |
RR |
8 |
X |
|
X |
x |
x |
x |
x |
CJ |
x |
D |
X |
CJ |
(5+3) to 1 |
65 |
6-26/4-28 |
Obergefell v Hodges--14thEP, gay marriage 4 |
R |
6 |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
X |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
66 |
6-29/3-2 |
AZ v AZ Comm--Elections Cl initiatives App |
A |
DCAz |
X |
|
|
x |
x |
X |
x |
x |
D |
D |
D |
D |
5 to 4 |
67 |
6-29/4-29 |
Glossip v Gross--8thA cap pun drugs §1983 |
A |
10 |
X |
|
X |
D |
D |
D |
D |
x |
x |
X |
C |
C |
5 to 4 |
68 |
6-29/3-25 |
Michigan v EPA--agency interpretation 3 |
RR |
DC |
|
S |
|
D |
D |
D |
D |
x |
x |
x |
X |
C |
5 to 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|