From Wikipedia: “Neoplatonism”
Neoplatonism is generally a metaphysical and epistemological
philosophy. Neoplatonism is a form of idealistic monism combined with elements of polytheism.
Although the founder of Neoplatonism is supposed to have been Ammonius Saccas
, the Enneads of his pupil Plotinus are the primary and classical
document of Neoplatonism. As a form of mysticism, it contains theoretical and
practical parts, the first dealing with the high origin of the human soul and
showing how it has departed from its first estate, and the second showing the
way by which the soul may again return to the Eternal and Supreme. The system
can be divided between the invisible world and the phenomenal world, the former
containing the transcendent One from
which emanates an eternal,
perfect, essence (nous), which, in turn, produces the world-soul.
The One
One of the characteristic features of Plotinus' system, which
was also taken up by subsequent Neoplatonists, is the
doctrine of "the One" beyond being. For Plotinus, the first principle
of reality is an utterly simple, ineffable, unknowable subsistence which is
both the creative source and the teleological end of all existing things.
Although, properly speaking, there is no name appropriate for the first principle, the most adequate names are "the One"
or "the Good". The One is so simple that it cannot even be said to
exist or to be a being. Rather, the creative principle of all things is beyond being,
a notion which is derived from book VI of the Republic,[11] when, in the course of his famous analogy of the Sun,
Plato says that the Good is beyond being (ἐπέκεινα
τῆς οὐσίας)
in power and dignity.[12] In Plotinus' model of reality, the One is the cause of the
rest of reality, which takes the form of two subsequent "hypostases",
Nous and Soul. Although Neoplatonists after Plotinus
adhered to his cosmological scheme in its most general outline, later
developments in the tradition also departed substantively from Plotinus'
teachings in regards to significant philosophical issues, such as the nature of
evil.
Demiurge or Nous
The original Being initially emanates, or throws out, the nous,
which is a perfect image of the One and the archetype
of all existing things. It is simultaneously both being
and thought, idea and ideal world. As image, the nous corresponds
perfectly to the One, but as derivative, it is entirely different. What
Plotinus understands by the nous is the highest sphere
accessible to the human mind, while also being pure intellect itself. Nous is
the most critical component of idealism, Neoplatonism being a pure form of
idealism.[13][14] The demiurge (the nous)
is the energy, or ergon (does the work), which manifests or organises the material world into perceivability
.
The world-soul
The image and product of the motionless nous is the world-soul, which, according to
Plotinus, is immaterial like the nous. Its relation to the nous is
the same as that of the nous to the One. It stands between the nous and
the phenomenal world, and it is permeated and illuminated by the former, but it
is also in contact with the latter. The nous/spirit is
indivisible; the world-soul may preserve its unity and remain in the nous,
but, at the same time, it has the power of uniting with the corporeal world and
thus being disintegrated. It therefore occupies an intermediate position. As a
single world-soul, it belongs in essence and destination to the intelligible
world; but it also embraces innumerable individual souls; and these can either allow themselves to be informed by the nous, or
turn aside from the nous and choose the phenomenal world and lose
themselves in the realm of the senses and the finite.
The phenomenal world
The soul, as a moving essence, generates the corporeal or phenomenal
world. This world ought to be so pervaded by the soul that its various parts
should remain in perfect harmony. Plotinus is no dualist in the same sense as
sects like theGnostics; in contrast, he
admires the beauty and splendour of the world. So
long as idea governs matter, or the soul governs the body, the world is fair
and good. It is an image - though a shadowy image - of the upper world, and the
degrees of better and worse in it are essential to the harmony of the whole.
But, in the actual phenomenal world, unity and harmony are replaced by strife
or discord; the result is a conflict, a becoming and vanishing, an illusive existence. And the reason for this state of things
is that bodies rest on a substratum of matter. Matter is the indeterminate:
that with no qualities. If destitute of form and idea, it is evil; as capable
of form, it is neutral. Evil here is understood as a parasite, having
no-existence of its own (parahypostasis), an
unavoidable outcome of the Universe, having an "other" necessity, as
a harmonizing factor.[15]
Practice
Here, then, we
enter upon the practical philosophy. Along the same road by which it descended,
the soul must retrace its steps back to the supreme Good. It must, first of
all, return to itself. This is accomplished by the practice of virtue, which aims at likeness to God,
and leads up to God. In the ethics of Plotinus, all the older
schemes of virtue are taken over and arranged in a graduated series. The lowest
stage is that of the civil virtues, then follow the purifying, and last of all
the divine virtues. The civil virtues merely adorn the life, without elevating
the soul. That is the office of the purifying virtues, by which the soul is
freed from sensuality and led back to itself, and thence to the nous.
By means of ascetic observances, the human
becomes once more a spiritual and enduring being, free from all sin. But there
is still a higher attainment; it is not enough to be sinless, one must become
"God" (henosis). This is reached
through contemplation of the primeval Being, the One — in other words, through
an ecstatic approach to it. Thought cannot attain to this, for thought reaches
only to thenous, and it itself is a kind of motion. It is only in a state of
perfect passivity and repose that the soul can recognise
and touch the primaeval Being. Hence, the soul must
first pass through a spiritual curriculum. Beginning with the contemplation of
corporeal things in their multiplicity and harmony, it then retires upon itself
and withdraws into the depths of its own being, rising thence to the nous,
the world of ideas. But, even there, it does not find the Highest, the One; it
still hears a voice saying, "not we have made ourselves". The last
stage is reached when, in the highest tension and concentration, beholding in
silence and utter forgetfulness of all things, it is able, as it were, to lose
itself. Then it sees God, the foundation of life, the source of being, the
origin of all good, the root of the soul. In that moment, it enjoys the highest
indescribable bliss; it is, as it were, swallowed up by divinity, bathed in the
light of eternity. Porphyry says that on four occasions during the six years of
their acquaintance, Plotinus attained to this ecstatic union with God.
Footnotes
11. Dodds, E.R. "The
Parmenides of Plato and the Origin of the Neoplatonic 'One'". The
Classical Quarterly, Jul–Oct 1928, vol. 22, p. 136
12. Plato, Republic 509b
13. Schopenhauer wrote of this Neoplatonist philosopher: "With
Plotinus there even appears, probably for the first time in Western philosophy, idealism that
had long been current in the East even at that time, for it taught
(Enneads, iii, lib. vii, c.10) that the soul has made the world by stepping from eternity intotime, with the explanation: 'For
there is for this universe no other place than the soul
or mind' (neque est alter hujus universi locus quam anima), indeed the ideality of time is
expressed in the words: 'We should not accept time outside the soul or mind' (oportet autem nequaquam extra animam tempus accipere)." (Parerga and Paralipomena,
Volume I, "Fragments for the History of Philosophy," § 7)
14. Similarly, professor
Ludwig Noiré wrote: "For the first time in
Western philosophy we find idealism proper in Plotinus (Enneads, iii, 7,
10), where he says, "The only space or place of the world is the
soul," and "Time must not be assumed to exist outside the soul."
Ludwig Noiré, Historical Introduction to Kant'sCritique of Pure Reason. It is worth noting,
however, that, like Plato, but unlike Schopenhauer and other modern
philosophers, Plotinus does not worry about whether or how we can get beyond
our ideas in order to know external objects.
15. Richard T. Wallis and Jay Bregman
(1992), Neoplatonism and Gnosticism, SUNY Press, pp. 42–45